standard
future
historic
gladiator
pioneer
explorer
modern
legacy
pauper
vintage
penny
commander
brawl
alchemy
paupercommander
duel
oldschool
premodern
Rulings
If a spell is both black and green, you pay less, not less.
The generic X cost is still considered generic even if there is a requirement that a specific color be used for it. For example, “only black mana can be spent this way”. This distinction is important for effects which reduce the generic portion of a spell’s cost.
The lower cost is not optional like with some other cost reducers.
If this card is sacrificed to pay part of a spell’s cost, the cost reduction still applies.
This can lower the cost to zero, but not below zero.
Can never affect the colored part of the cost.
The effect is cumulative.
The generic X cost is still considered generic even if there is a requirement that a specific color be used for it. For example, “only black mana can be spent this way”. This distinction is important for effects which reduce the generic portion of a spell’s cost.
The lower cost is not optional like with some other cost reducers.
If this card is sacrificed to pay part of a spell’s cost, the cost reduction still applies.
This can lower the cost to zero, but not below zero.
Can never affect the colored part of the cost.
The effect is cumulative.
Rulings
If a spell is both black and green, you pay less, not less.
The generic X cost is still considered generic even if there is a requirement that a specific color be used for it. For example, “only black mana can be spent this way”. This distinction is important for effects which reduce the generic portion of a spell’s cost.
The lower cost is not optional like with some other cost reducers.
If this card is sacrificed to pay part of a spell’s cost, the cost reduction still applies.
This can lower the cost to zero, but not below zero.
Can never affect the colored part of the cost.
The effect is cumulative.
The generic X cost is still considered generic even if there is a requirement that a specific color be used for it. For example, “only black mana can be spent this way”. This distinction is important for effects which reduce the generic portion of a spell’s cost.
The lower cost is not optional like with some other cost reducers.
If this card is sacrificed to pay part of a spell’s cost, the cost reduction still applies.
This can lower the cost to zero, but not below zero.
Can never affect the colored part of the cost.
The effect is cumulative.
Your collection? Your decks?
Want to manage your collection and/or create decks?